On The Main Blog

Creative Minority Reader

Obama Warns Court Against Judicial Activism

Ha! I guess for Obama, that means any decision he doesn't agree with.

Obama Launches Pre-Emptive Strike On Supreme Court, Says They Will Be Guilty of “Judicial Activism” If They Strike Down Obamacare…
Continue reading>>>

Your Ad Here

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

If Obama is reelected, then America deserves to disintegrate. I cannot respect anyone who supports Obama or the Democrats. You've got to be lobotomized to support someone so moronic. For the President to say something so patently moronic and semi-treasonous should be unthinkable.

Mary De Voe said...

Semi-treasonous?. Completely treasonous. Threatening the JUSTICES of the Supreme Court for the United States of America is a crime against America. Inveighing against the evidence is perjury after the jurors JUSTICES)have been sequestered, perjury against the testimony. A lie. Obamacare is what it is. If Obama care cannot stand on its own, it ought to be bannished as treason and corruption. Who gave HHS the power to write into law after the fact of informed consent of the people?What kind of FREEDOM is this: "Pass it so we can learn what is in it." Pelosi. Extorting the trust of the people and distorting our form of government, Obamacare is slavery, treason from Obama. There is no decency in Obama. May the wrath of God consume Obama.

Mary De Voe said...

It bears repeating: PERJURY AND THREATS AGAINST THE TESTIMONY.

Mary De Voe said...

"Obama suggested that the Supreme Court would be guilty of “judicial activism” if it overturned the law, and stressed that he believed the justices would see the individual mandate as an integral part of the law." The individual mandate is the imposition of slavery and by a black man. Obama reinforces the imposition of slavery against the freedom of every American citizen and is using the weight of the Supreme Court as a weapon against freedom.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, phew we definitely dont want any judicial activism, because that would be bad. And what's all this with the Supreme Court being so interested in the constitution all of a sudden...

Lisa said...

This is laughable! Of course, the Supreme Court justices are NOT elected because they need to be objective in rendering justice! They are not to be swayed by the dictates of the mob, but must be faithful and answerable to their office! Just goes to show that this President does NOT understand the Constitution at all!

While it is true that we do see instances of judicial activism, especially in lower courts where a sole judge may render a decision, this is NOT the case in the Supreme Court where 9 independent, intelligent and knowledgeable justices must study, meet, debate and concur before rendering a decision. This latest comment of Obama is just an example of what a bullying idealogue would retort to get his way!


Popular Posts