Did I actually just read this in the Washington Post?Continue reading>>>
I'm pro-choice, and Tebow clearly is not. But based on what I've heard in the past week, I'll take his side against the group-think, elitism and condescension of the "National Organization of Fewer and Fewer Women All The Time." For one thing, Tebow seems smarter than they do.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
WaPo Editorial: Tebow's are Right
Wow. I didn't expect this. Kathryn Lopez is shocked as well:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)







2 comments:
For me, this is one of those moments that is a gentle reminder that people may be on the way to the Kingdom, and it would behoove us to aid their progress by allowing them the space to grapple with their current thoughts, knowing that God is bigger than all of it.
Amen. It must be tought to be a squeemish pro-choicer, wrestling with science that tells us of the horrendous risk to post-abortion women of breast cancer, of sonograms showing babies being brutalized and murdered in their mothers' wombs, the eugneics/racist agenda behind the holocaust of 13,000,000 black babies out of 50,000,000...It isn't a good time intellectually/emotionally to be a pro-choicer. As an ex-pro-choicer who came to see reason 20 years ago I still look at myself in the mirror and ask how I could ever have bought the propaganda?
Post a Comment